Log in Apply for a pilot →
PartnersAboutContactSupport One platform for individuals, businesses and governments
Home / Government & national / Digital government foundation
V5 · DIGITAL GOVERNMENT FOUNDATION

Every agency rebuilding its own login and forms is the most expensive repetition in government IT.

The foundation turns identity, permissions, forms, cases and notifications into a shared layer that agencies connect their own services to. Residents meet one entrance, staff meet one permission model, and service data returns to the agency that owns it.

A bright public service hall, citizens seen from behind walking toward a row of counters with blank signage boards
Figure 1 · The service hall: residents meet one entrance; cases route to the right agency behind it.
4shared foundation, agencies plug in
4steps, one service first
2identity classes, kept apart
1rule: service data is never used for marketing

Money agencies spend again and again

Separate systems keep rebuilding the same wheels.

A login per agency

Residents register again at every service. Staff permissions are managed in silos, and leavers are often revoked late.

Forms & cases that stop at the border

An application goes in, progress cannot be checked, missing documents travel by phone, and cross-agency transfer runs on word of mouth.

Data that never returns

Services run inside supplier systems. The statistics live with the supplier, and changing supplier starts with losing the data.

Small agencies cannot carry a system

A service window with modest volume cannot spread the cost of its own procurement and operations.

Foundation make-up

The shared layer runs four things. The business stays with each agency.

Institutional identity layer

One ID derives organisation structure, role permissions, single sign-on integration and access audit. Resident and staff identities are governed separately.

  • Organisation structure and role permissions
  • Single sign-on integration
  • Resident and staff identities governed separately
  • Access audit trails

Forms & case engine

Forms, materials, intake, supplementation, completion and notification become a configurable engine. Agencies assemble their own process on top.

  • Configurable forms and material lists
  • Intake, supplementation and completion in one flow
  • Progress notifications sent automatically
  • Cross-agency transfers on record

Funds & disbursement ledger

Subsidy and grant ledgers are designed separately under fiscal rules, accounted and audited apart from the KINGAI consumer wallet.

  • Designed separately under fiscal rules
  • Accounted apart from the consumer wallet
  • Disbursement records auditable
  • Definitions set by the fiscal owner

Service data layer

Case volumes, processing times and satisfaction return to each agency data partition. The agency sets the definitions; export can be verified at any time.

  • Volumes, times and satisfaction flow back
  • Data partitioned by agency
  • Definitions set by the agency
  • Export verifiable at any time

Smart service components that stack on top

Beyond the foundation, the resident-facing layer can be added piece by piece — no need to wait for the full build.

Agency policy Q&A

A Q&A base built on the agency’s issued policy and service documents: residents ask the front desk first, answers carry their source, and the base is revised in step with the documents.

  • Answers drawn only from issued documents
  • Document updates flow into the Q&A base
  • Anything beyond is handed to staff with a summary

Checklists & status lookup

Per-service document checklists generated automatically, with case status connected back to foundation data for resident self-service — cutting repeat questions at counters and hotlines first.

  • Checklists generated per service
  • Status lookup under the agency’s permission model
  • Supplement notices delivered automatically

Backlog workbench

Accumulated enquiries and work orders sorted by urgency for staff; at peaks the smart desk takes first contact, and staff handle only what needs judgment.

  • Backlogs sorted by urgency
  • Peak triage absorbs first contact
  • Every handling step on record

Procurement & rollout

Components contracted and accepted item by item; multiple agencies can run through cooperative purchasing and framework agreements — settled once, onboarded agency by agency, with data partitioning fixed per agency.

  • Per-component contracting and acceptance
  • Cooperative purchasing and frameworks available
  • Agency-by-agency onboarding and acceptance

How the platform connects

The foundation is itself one piece of the platform layer.

One ID underneath

Authorisation, member numbering, bans and session rules already run in production. The institutional edition adds organisation and governance on top.

Situational core, optionally

Service hotspots and event data can feed agency operations analysis, authorised separately by mandate.

ONE operations foundation

Monitoring, upgrades and re-verification after launch are operated centrally, so agencies do not each staff an operations team.

Delivery route

Land one service for one agency first, then copy sideways. Every step leaves something you can inspect.

1

Service inventory

Pick one high-volume service and map its forms, materials, approvals and notifications.
Deliverables: the service inventory sheet: forms, materials, approvals and notifications mapped.

2

Foundation connection

Build the agency organisation and permissions first, then run the pilot service on the foundation.
Deliverables: the connection pack: agency organisation and permission table, and the pilot service launch record.

3

Multi-agency expansion

Further agencies connect to the same standard, with data partitions and definitions accepted one by one.
Deliverables: per-agency acceptance sheets: partition confirmation and definition sign-off.

4

Operating re-verification

Processing times, anomalies and upgrades are re-verified monthly while the foundation version evolves centrally.
Deliverables: monthly re-verification reports: processing times, anomaly lists and upgrade records.

  • Engagement combines foundation build, per-agency connection and managed operations.
  • Data is partitioned by agency. Cross-agency sharing is authorised item by item.
  • Identity-verification steps connect to compliant providers or existing agency systems by jurisdiction. The foundation claims no verification licence of its own.

Governance & data limits

A shared foundation fails on unclear ownership. Write it first, connect second.

Data belongs to the agency

Case and resident data belong to the connected agency. KINGAI accesses it only as operations require, with logs available.

Never used for marketing

Government service data never enters KINGAI acquisition or advertising systems. This goes into the contract.

Permissions follow the post

Staff access follows the role. Transfers and departures revoke automatically, and abnormal access alerts separately.

Exit with everything

On exit, data, configuration and documentation export in full, with an assistance period written into the contract.

Questions, answered

How does the foundation sit with our existing government platforms?

It is a shared layer underneath them, not a replacement. Identity, forms, cases and notifications consolidate onto the foundation; existing agency systems connect against the interface standard, and the consolidation pace is set item by item in the connection design.

How does the funds ledger connect to fiscal systems?

The ledger is designed under fiscal rules, with definitions set by the fiscal owner. Subsidy and grant ledgers are accounted and audited apart from the consumer wallet; how they connect to fiscal systems is settled per jurisdiction in the connection design.

Can a small agency afford it?

That is what the shared layer is for. The foundation is built and operated once, centrally; agencies connect and use it instead of each procuring a system and staffing an operations team.

Who can see resident data?

The connected agency owns it; we access it only as operations require. Access follows roles and is logged, and government service data never enters our acquisition or advertising systems. That goes into the contract.

Who performs identity verification for residents?

Compliant providers or the agency's existing systems, by jurisdiction. The foundation claims no verification licence of its own; the verification step is settled in the connection design under local rules.

How long is the exit assistance period?

It is written into the contract, sized to the data volume and the connected systems. On exit, data, configuration and documentation export in full and can be verified item by item. Data is never held hostage to a renewal.

Where to next

TRUST

Trust & compliance

Deployment models, data sovereignty, security operations, supply-chain screening and use limits, in one place.

Read the compliance position →

OVERVIEW

National solutions

Where the foundation sits in the full range, on the overview page.

Back to overview →

CITY

Smart city systems

The foundation is the government-service part of the city platform layer. See the split on the city page.

See city systems →

Land one high-volume service first

Send the agency type and the one service you most want moved first. The reply covers connection route and data-partition terms.

Send a digital-service brief →